About gkinnard

I’m a novice blogger who is seeking order and purpose to life through writing—life seems to make a lot more sense when you write about it. You’re invited to stop by my blog, Coalescence, and have a read! I’d love it if you would share your experiences; offer some advice, insight, or direction; or simply provide me with a reality check or two!

Sunday Spin #26, Bob Dylan, “Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts”

 


Sunday Spin is a weekly feature of Coalescence. I use it to highlight some of my favorite music and talk a little about what the song means in the context of my life. Comments are highly encouraged!


First released in 1975, here’s this Sunday’s Spin!

_____________________________________

Spotify link: Bob Dylan – Lily, Rosemary And The Jack Of Hearts

_____________________________________

Somewhere over on the Missouri side of the state line, I have a brother named, Tim. He and I were very tight until a fight we had about twenty years ago. We didn’t speak to each other for a decade, but eventually we formed a working relationship: enough at least to suffice for the purposes of family get-togethers. Shortly after my father’s funeral nearly three years ago, my brother cut ties with the family. He’s been spotted once since then—so we know he’s okay—but refuses to return phone calls from any of us. I was playing around with Spotify recently and ran onto a song that made me think of Tim: Bob Dylan’s, Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts.  

_____________________________________

Tim was the high school senior voted ”most likely to commit mayhem”—I’m being dead serious here. To everyone’s great surprise, about halfway through his twenties Tim settled down and has done extremely well for himself since. Career-wise, Tim has worked a high-paying union job for 30+ years now. As someone who is extremely good (tight) with money, I’m quite sure his house has been paid off for many years; the only thing he splurges on is a new Mercedes every year or two. He’s a good-looking guy who never married. . . .

Years ago when we were close, the two of us spent a lot of time riding around and listening to music. Tim was a big Bob Dylan fan during the time we were in high school (he’s a year younger than me) and Dylan’s 1975 release, Blood on the Tracks, was one of his favorites. It featured a long song called, Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts, which we’d listen to on the 8-track player in his 1962 Chevy Impala SS convertible: a car the two of us painted and pinstriped together.

_____________________________________

Tim and I back in the days of Dylan’s Blood on the Tracks (and yes, Tim is wearing a leisure suit and chukka boots)

Tim’s ’62 Impala SS during a high school parade (those are Homecoming Queen candidates riding in back)

Anyway . . . I’m sure Tim’s doing well these days. As screwy a bunch as we Kinnards can be at times, I do hope he sees fit to rejoin the pack eventually. I’ll keep you posted.

_____________________________________

Do you have memories of ‘Lily, Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts’—or perhaps another song by Bob Dylan?

 


CREDIT FOR TURNTABLE IMAGE 


One year under his belt!

Yesterday Sam (who has autism) finished the first year of his 18-21 transitional-student program through the local school district. To say that Patty and I have been thrilled with his experience in this program would be the understatement of the century: the whole year has been fantastic!

This program has been great for many reasons. Through it, Sam’s been able to learn life skills in the classroom. He’s been able to get out into the community four to five days a week. He and his class have gone on fieldtrips to a host of destinations: about a million coffeehouses, various grocery stores, several museums, a bunch of thrift stores, farms, Allen Field house at the University of Kansas, the Harry S.Truman Museum and Library, and on and on. Through this program he’s learned about riding public transportation, practiced cooking, worked at several jobs on the community, AND he’s been able to take [modified] college courses at a local community college! And to top it all off, every single one of the staff involved have been communicative and supportive!

Today is Sam’s first day off. He began it by having his “characters” go through a school awards ceremony on our kitchen counter (Patty and I are back by the Cheez-Its). Pretty cool, huh?

Sam’s characters go through an end of school year awards ceremony

Sunday Spin #25, Joni Mitchell, “Help Me”

 


Sunday Spin is a weekly feature of Coalescence. I use it to highlight some of my favorite music and talk a little about what the song means in the context of my life. Comments are highly encouraged!


First released as a single in 1974, here’s this Sunday’s Spin!

 _____________________________________

Call me a little too mellow, call me stuck in the ‘70s, call me whatever: I like Joni Mitchell. I always have! I was sitting in a Wendy’s last week having lunch—and scratching out a blog post on a steno-pad—when Joni Mitchell’s, Help Me, came over the restaurant’s sound system. Man, it was so refreshing to hear this song—especially after the tough morning I’d had at work. The song is light & airy, free & easy, fresh & cleansing: it makes you feel new. Yes, there were a lot of great rock tunes out during the ‘70s, but there was also a ton of fantastic folk/easy-listening music as well. Mitchell had this genre down cold!

So is it just me or is this a great song? (I’d love to know what you think!)


Visiting Dad: A quarter-hour . . .

“Look for a long time at what pleases you, and longer still at what pains you.” —Sidonie-Gabrielle Colette

“There are as many nights as days, and the one is just as long as the other in the year’s course. Even a happy life cannot be without a measure of darkness, and the word ‘happy’ would lose its meaning if it were not balanced by sadness.” —Carl Gustav Jung

“Reconciliation is to understand both sides; to go to one side and describe the suffering being endured by the other side, then go to the other side and describe the suffering being endured by the first side.” —Thich Nhat Hanh


The last three years of my father’s life were marked by severe decline. Intellectually and socially he was isolated: He had passed through a combative stage where he managed to alienate most of his family, and moved to one in which he could only follow the most basic of conversations—and only then for a short period of time. He was not well-oriented to place, time, and person—he had begun forgetting some people. Falls became frequent; even with a walker he could barely walk room to room. He required a lot of medication for multiple health issues and was unable to manage this on his own. He became incontinent.

Having worked with older adults for over a decade, I knew then that my father met every possible criterion for entrance into long-term care: nursing home care. I let my mother know my feelings and opinion regarding this on many occasions; other members of the family did as well. But Mom’s choice was to keep Dad at home with her . . . out in the country . . . alone. I didn’t agree with her, but I respected the fact that it was her decision to make.

____________________________________

Dad’s death was one that I wouldn’t wish on an enemy. No one witnessed its beginning—conjecture is all we have for that—but we saw enough of the end to know it was the kind of death none of us desire.

In the middle of an August night—despite having extremely limited mobility—my father managed to get out of bed unassisted and unnoticed (he and my mother slept in separate rooms) and make his way to a bathroom at the rear of my parent’s farmhouse. (This was very unusual behavior for him and was beyond what anyone thought he was physically capable of.) After making it into the restroom he suffered a massive stroke. He lost consciousness and fell to the floor. He came to rest in a terrible, tangled, cramped position. He laid there for several hours before my mother awoke for the day and found him.

Dominos fell over the next two days. The stroke led to his fall. The fall led to his laying in a cramped position for several hours. Laying stationary in a cramped position for several hours led to rhabdomyolysis. The rhabdomylosis led to acute kidney failure; other organs began to fail as well. All of this led to the need for artificial means of supporting life—and the need for a decision to be made. Mercifully for those who would go on living, the last domino fell: my father passed shortly before that decision was put into effect.

 ____________________________________

I wasn’t invited to speak at dad’s funeral service; as far as I know that was never even considered. The affair was to be a religious one and mine is not the first face that comes to mind when religion is brought up in our family. (Most family members assume—incorrectly—that I am an atheist.) My youngest brother, Rob, who is full to the brim with religion, would officiate along with his pastor—a man my father had never met in life.

The service was a bit surreal. Many of those in attendance were victims—or at least perceived themselves as such—of a family scandal that was just coming to light. Tensions were high, but none boiled over. My brother and his pastor took turns speaking. The two painted a quite lovely, but less than accurate, picture of my parents as a romantic and religious couple. I asked myself, “Are they talking about my parents—my father?” At the same time I was fuming on the inside: I felt that, once again, I had been shutout, ignored, not treated as a member of the family. I remember my wife, Patty, quietly marveling that that she couldn’t believe I wasn’t being called on to speak. I’m sure she felt sorry for me.

 ____________________________________

On a peaceful hillside in the country we gathered to bury my father. He would rest next to my brother, Steve. My parent’s old farmhouse, not quite a mile distant, was easily seen from where we stood. A group of young Marines were present to fire a salute in recognition of my father’s military service—he would have liked that a lot! Everyone who should have been there—by his grave—was there. Passions, self-interest, old and new grudges were set aside and everyone got along for a moment. Reality—a very fluid thing in our family—stopped shifting and a truth was agreed upon: George Kinnard, Sr. was a good man who would be missed. All was as it should be for this quarter-hour. The young Marines fired their rifles three times . . . Dad would have liked this a lot.

____________________________________

AFTERWORD

My father was a good man who I dearly loved. I miss him—I hope this has come across in my writing. Regarding the strange, seamier, and dark things I’ve written about during the course of this series, I would point out that life is not all sunshine & happiness: it can be a complicated and messy place where lines often blur. My father did the best he could with what he had to work with—honestly, I feel he did a helluva job given the health issues and demons he was handed by life. Because I believe in a life beyond death, I know that I will see Dad again. In that place—wherever it may be—Dad and I will have a proper chance to offer apologies to each other—and the perspective to know each in essence. I’m okay with that: I can wait for this in peace. 

I want to note that after the moment passed, I got over being mad about not being invited to speak at Dad’s service. I attend a lot of funerals and I know that here’s a hierarchy that should be respected in regard to how a service is done: the deceased’s spouse—in this case, my mother—should under most circumstances have all the say-so in this matter. That’s how I want mine handled: Patty’s in charge—period. If my mother wanted/needed a love story and a bunch of religion presented at Dad’s service, then, by God, that’s the way it should have been. Does that mean I was left out in the cold regarding my chance to talk about Dad? No . . . I have this story.

my sister, Julie, took this photograph just prior to graveside services

 


This is the final post in my Visiting Dad series.


Visiting Dad: Personae non gratae

“It has been said, ‘time heals all wounds.’ I do not agree. The wounds remain. In time, the mind, protecting its sanity, covers them with scar tissue and the pain lessens. But it is never gone.” —Rose Kennedy

“The deepest wounds aren’t the ones we get from other people hurting us. They are the wounds we give ourselves when we hurt other people.” —Isobelle Carmody (from Alyzon Whitestarr)

“Every family has its lowest common denominator: a member who by all rights should wield the least amount of influence. It’s a sad fact that often this is exactly the person who directs and defines a family’s life. In the case of my family, this person was my ex-wife.” —George Kinnard, Jr. (Coalescence) 


Brad and I at my parent’s farmhouse around the time of the divorce (Dad is on the roof behind me)


1

From the time I was born until I was 24, there was one thing in the world that I knew I could count on irregardless of circumstance: the support of my parents and siblings. As dysfunctional as our family could be at times, there was no reason in the world for me to ever even consider thinking otherwise. We defended each other—even when the member in need of defense was dead wrong. We covered each other’s back. We covered each other’s tracks. We presented a united front without fail. Right or wrong, that was the family mindset; that was the family in practice. That’s how we rolled back then.

______________________________________

In the spring of 1981 my wife Deborah left me for the last time. She’d rehearsed this final move at least a million times before, beginning two weeks after we married in the summer of ‘79 when she left for the first time. Our split came as a surprise to absolutely no one: it was obvious to family and friends that she and I were two very different people who should have never gotten together in the first place. Although the two of us didn’t care much for each other at that point in time, we didn’t necessarily hate each other either. I am convinced to this day—31 years later—that if we had been left alone to work out the particulars of the spilt and its aftermath we’d have done so amicably.

But we weren’t left alone. For reasons known only to God, fate, or the random nature of the universe—for those are the only entities who could possibly be credited for this—my parents decided to interfere in my separation and divorce from Deborah—and in our lives thereafter.

This interference changed the playing field. Deborah’s side—now consisting of her and my parents—had several advantages: 1) Position: my parents lived within 10 miles of where Deborah had now moved (I was over 50 miles away). 2) Resources: my father had his “ways” of coming up with plenty of money and/or stuff. 3) Time: my mother didn’t work outside the home so she was capable of providing that as necessary.

My parent’s choice to join Deborah’s side in this contest meant that she had all the support needed: money, clothing, transportation and free childcare on demand—when Deborah said the word, she got it. As you can imagine she was thrilled—and as you can imagine this left me nothing at all to use as leverage in the negotiation process. Since she was getting all she could ever dream of and more from my parents, there was zero incentive to work with me and every incentive in the world to work against me—to try to get me to go away—which is precisely what she has done for the past 31 years.

While Deborah lived her life out loud with the help of my parents, relationships in our family changed forever. Trust between my parents and I was severely damaged: what remained was a kind of warped family loyalty. My relationship with my brother Tim would end as a result of fighting over secrets kept from me (related to Deborah’s behavior). My late brother Steve’s four kids would never know anything resembling a normal relationship with their grandparents—all the oxygen was sucked out of that room by what it took to keep Deborah happy. My position and status in the family was reduced to that of irrelevance: persona non grata. My relationship with my oldest son, Brad, would never be anything even close to what it should have been—to this day it’s tenuous at best. Except when I was needed for something that the rest of the family couldn’t manage to do on their own, I became an afterthought.

With no good reason or explanation I had been unfairly wronged by those closest to me. I spent many years more than half-convinced that there must be something wrong with me: otherwise why would my parents do something like this? In the early years I fought often with my mother about this betrayal. That did no good: the more I fought about it the more Mom coddled Deborah and Dad would throw money and stuff at the problem—it was like being stuck in quicksand. Only once did I get any kind of rationale from my mother for what they had done. During a fight she told me that, “God had told her to act as she had: to take the side she did for the children involved.” I told her that I wanted no part of a god that would do this to me—to us.

______________________________________

 In 1981 the choice was between a few months of negotiation and a few decades of pain and suffering. I wish my parents would have stayed out of the mess and let Deborah and I work it out; I wish they’d let the injury scab over and heal. I learned to live with what they had done, but I never forgave either for their interference.

 ______________________________________

 2

One evening in the winter of 2006, Patty, Sam, and I took a trip down to my parent’s house for a rare opportunity: a chance to see my youngest grandson. A few days earlier during a phone conversation, my mother had told me how much she enjoyed my oldest son, Brad, allowing her to spend so much time with her great-grandson . . . my grandson. Mom likely intended no slight towards me, but it cut me nonetheless and—fair or not—I let her know it. (I had only seen my grandson three or four times in his entire life and she was getting to see him all the time—another byproduct of the long-term interference.) She quickly negotiated a visit.

The three of us made the 75 mile trip after my workday ended. We pulled into to the drive of my parent’s farmhouse well after dark. Mom and my grandson, “K,” were waiting; my father was waiting as well—but not for a visit.

At this point in his life Dad was in very poor shape, both physically and cognitively. Most days he just stayed in his bedroom and slept. When he did come out to interact, it usually wasn’t good: he was going through a mean phase—a very mean phase. Tonight he was wide awake and—unfortunately—tracking quite well.)

We got to see K for about two minutes when my Dad managed to drag himself into the room. Without a moment’s hesitation or provocation he started in on me about Brad and his family. Dad wanted me to agree with him that Brad and his family (who were staying there a few days) were pieces of trash and it was the right thing to do to require that they all sleep in the garage—like dogs. It seemed perfectly logical to him that I would agree with what he was saying: in fact, he insisted on it.

I asked him what the hell would make him think I was going to agree with him. He told me again that my oldest son was trash. I told him if he was then it was because he helped make him that way—after all, hadn’t he done all he could to take the job of father away from me and raise my son his way. I put things on his terms: I accused him of outbidding me for the job—of buying my family and stealing my life from me. Dad didn’t like this at all and it got real ugly after that.  

My father did all he could to make sure I knew how worthless he thought I was. He went through a laundry-list of reasons why this would be true. (Yes: he was quite demented at the time, but every single word he shot at me hit the bull’s-eye.) We yelled and cursed at each other at the top of our lungs for about 15-20 minutes; locked in combat as if there was no one in the world right then except for him and me.

Dad’s ugliness hit me right where it hurt: since age 24 I felt my life had been devalued; now I was hearing that my very existence meant nothing at all. I fought on.  

I did all I could do to let him know how pathetic I thought he’d turned out and that I never wanted to end up a lonely, mean-assed, money-loving, old man like him. I punctuated my thoughts with liberal use of the “F-word.”

This was one of the darkest moments of my life and it would take a very long time for me to recover from it.  

Brad and his girlfriend, and my former step-son and his girlfriend all showed up at this point and helped break up the fight. Shortly after, Patty, Sam, and I left without a visit with my grandson.

In the weeks following this fight, my father phoned me several times—crying—begging me to accept his apology. Each time he asked I refused. For the next couple of years I treated him as irrelevant: persona non grata.

By the time I was willing to issue forgiveness, there was not enough of Dad’s mind left to ask me for it. 

[THE SERIES WILL CONCLUDE TOMORROW]

 ______________________________________

 AFTERWORD

Divorce is a negotiation between two parties who have decided they can no longer work together. It is a time to divide what can be divided and work out terms for sharing what cannot. It is a time to settle issues involving money, property, and visitation rights if applicable. It is at once an end and a starting point: a chance to push one of life’s biggest reset buttons and hopefully move forward. It is not a time when unwarranted interference is either welcome or productive.

Divorce is also an injury to one’s life which is fully capable of healing given proper treatment and opportunity to scab over. However, handled poorly the injury of divorce is also more than capable of developing into a nasty, leprous ulcer that will ooze, fester, and plague one for the rest of their life until it eventually destroys them. That was how things ended up in our case: interference infected the injury caused by the divorce and enabled it to kill off waht was the Kinnard family. 


“Visiting Dad” is a series regarding my father and my relationship with him, as seen through my eyes. The conclusion of this series will post 05-19-12.  (Please see my category, “Series: Visiting Dad,” for other posts.)


 

Convergence: A note to those who’ve been following my “Visiting Dad” series

First off, thank you! Your readership and tolerance of my lengthy posts are greatly appreciated! Your comments have been off the charts: more thoughtful and insightful than I could ever have hoped for—and I’ve used many as a guide when deciding upon the direction and depth of subsequent posts. Again, thank you so much!

I am directing this particular post towards you for a couple of reasons: 1) Muse and time willing, I intend to wrap this series up in two more posts: one next Friday and one Saturday. 2) I realized from the start that this series would eventually converge with some of my earlier posts—ones that only a very few folks had read—so I thought that when this time of convergence arrived I might try to highly encourage my readers to go back and take a look at these as a way of providing additional context/meaning for the end of my Visiting Dad series. Please note that reading these older posts isn’t essential for finishing my series (the series’ end should make sense without reading them) but I am encouraging this.

Should you choose to read them please know that I don’t expect you to comment on each. It is fine if you choose to, but I don’t want to wear out my welcome by taking up too much of your time. (If you’re so inclined, just click a “like” or two and I’ll know you’ve been by.)

Here are links to the posts I’m talking about.

The first, “What did I want to be when I grew up? (Part 1),” was published on 10-23-11. (Yes, yes, yes, I know that’s a r-e-a-l-l-y corny title that sounds like some 3rd grade homework assignment.) My intention was to do a very short series on what my initial career dream was and how things in that regard eventually ended up. This particular post ends at the point that my family moved to rural Missouri—the point where my early dreams would dissipate. I do plan on going back to that series (3 posts?) eventually.

Published on 11-19-11 and 11-26-11 respectively, “1978—the line of demarcation in my life” and “1978 & 1979—on the expressway to perdition” begins the story of my doomed-right-from-the-start first marriage: a disaster that will figure greatly in my Visiting Dad series as it comes to an end. I intended these two posts to lead to a series which might one day be discovered by my oldest son, Brad (Sam’s half-brother), and/or one or both of his two children (my grandkids who know basically nothing at all about me), or possibly other interested parties who might actually care to hear the untold side of the story—which would be my side.

Because it’s difficult for me to write about—and I think it bothered Patty (my wife) a bit to read—I haven’t gone back and picked back up on the painful tale. At some point I will likely go back and work on it again . . . we’ll see.

Related to the above, my 01-02-12 post, “Like the legendary Billy Pilgrim . . . ,” discusses why I tend to write the way I do at times (out of chronological sequence) and what drives my choice of subject matter. I wrote this post in a letter to my wife form, because Patty had just started reading my blog and was confused as to my style of writing and where I was going with things: I thought the post would help clear that up a bit. I feel that reading it before finishing my Visiting Dad series will give you a better understanding of my unsettledness in life—and in my writing.

Two others, 12-02-11’s, “Eulogy for a shed and its maker,” and 08-29-11’s, “At the moment of my father’s death,” are also posts in this vein which are well worth reading—when you have the time and energy. They deal with my thoughts after Dad’s death.

Should you choose to read any or all of these, please know that—once again—I don’t expect you to comment on each; I’m just offering them as a tool to give you more context and meaning as my Visiting Dad series ends.  

______________________________________

Thanks again for sticking with me through this series! The process of writing it up, posting it, and responding to your comments have all been extremely good for me! I can’t possibly thank you enough!

—George  

Sunday Spin #24, Queen, “You’re my Best Friend”


Sunday Spin is a weekly feature of Coalescence. I use it to highlight some of my favorite music and talk a little about what the song means in the context of my life. Comments are highly encouraged!


First released as a single in 1976, here’s this Sunday’s Spin!

 _____________________________________

Happy Mother’s day! Today’s Spin is dedicated to my wife, Patty, the mother of my son, Sam! My wife and I share a love of Queen—she’s even seen them in concert when Freddie was still alive! The title and lyrics of this song fit perfectly with the wonderful, loving, and long term relationship that Patty and I share. With all that in mind, I thought You’re My Best Friend would be the most fitting song to feature today! Enjoy! (I love you Patty!)

Is this song a favorite of yours? 


Sitting here having a cup of coffee I paused to ask myself, “Is marriage equality likely to end life as we know it?”

The answer is no. War might. Disease might. The dynamic processes that go on beneath our planet might. An asteroid crashing into our planet might. Climate change might. God might. Hate—above all else—has the best prospects for ending life as we know it: not love.

For God’s sake it’s time for us to grow up: love and the desire for legally-recognized long-term commitment is not an evil thing—how could it possibly be? Let me go on the record as saying that I support marriage equality.

Back to my coffee now.

[PS: Joe Biden makes one hell of an opening act, doesn’t he?]     

Visiting Dad: Plausible deniability (part 2)

“I can tell you from experience that rivers fed by madness are swift: if you jump into one you should expect to find it very hard to swim back to the safety of the bank.” —George Kinnard, Jr. (Coalescence)

“Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord.” —Colossians 3:20 (Holy Bible, King James version)

“I grew into it. It grew into me. It and I blurred at the edges, became one amorphous, seeping, crawling thing.” —Marya Hornbacher (Madness: A Bipolar Life)  


A caveat: I’ll be relating the remainder of this story from behind a cloak of plausible deniability. There exists no proof at all that what I’ll be telling you is the truth. Ask me if there is anything to my story and I’ll promptly tell you I made it all up—got it? In fact, let’s just go ahead and work under the assumption that I’m lying through my teeth and simply engaging in a rather pathetic attempt to raise my blog stats (yeah—that’ll work). With that out of the way, I would appreciate it if you would do me the kindness of reading on anyway.


I was 18 years old, just out of high school, when I learned for certain something I had been suspecting for quite some time: my father was supplementing the family income through illicit means. This revelation didn’t come with fanfare or as the result of tragedy, but more of a matter of fact welcome to adulthood declaration by my father: “Georgie, you’re old enough now to know how some things in life work.” I’ll give no particulars on this activity—except to that you’ll have to trust me when I tell you that nothing perverse was involved and no one got hurt or rich in the process and our family’s standard of living was only incrementally raised.

____________________________________

I can attest without equivocation that my father would absolutely never do anything consciously to harm his children—that is the God’s honest truth. But ironically—due to underlying psychopathology—he would in time do just that: as his kids grew older he involved some of them in this affair—he made his dark world theirs.

If you’ve never been to such a place before—a parallel world, one created and governed by a person’s mental illness—let me tell you that it’s a surprisingly easy destination to find and enter: especially when you are happily following the lead of someone you love and trust. But be warned: once you’ve entered such a world extricating yourself from it can be an entirely different matter.

In the case of my father, as long as there was strength and opportunity to engage in this activity, it continued. It would not end until age and disability entered the picture. It wasn’t done out of necessity—no one was in danger of starving—it was an act of compulsion: an ongoing and persistent lack of impulse control. Although he knew this behavior was punishable by law, that wasn’t deterrent enough: the drive inside him always won out in the end. In this regard, sadly—very sadly—age and disability would prove to be a blessing for my father, myself, and our family.

____________________________________

Before you follow anyone into such a world—a world where the rules don’t apply to you and yours—let me offer some counsel based on personal experience.

You are the healthy one: this is not your world and you do not have to enter it—stay away! This is a place of sickness and it will change you in no good way whatsoever—its effects will bleed over into all areas of your life. If you enter you will find your self-esteem riding a rollercoaster. Boundaries will be blurred. Lies will come easier. You will become very accustomed to using people. You will see what belongs to another as yours for the taking. Unnecessary risks will make perfect sense. Depression will come for an extended visit and you will find yourself in great need of mood-altering substances to give you false courage or escape. You will make very poor choices in relationships: who would want someone like you anyway? At best you will be conflicted; at worst, persuaded. You will lose precious time from your life.

If you survive this place and find yourself ready to come home, you must be prepared for a very long trip: your goal—home, the place called sanity—may only be a dot somewhere out the horizon. The sage tells us that, “There is no honor among thieves,” so expect that any bond formed during such activity will eventually be broken. For any number of reasons your guide through this world—the person who is sick—will abandon you at some point and you will be forced to make the arduous journey back home to sanity on your own. It will not be easy; I wish you luck.

____________________________________

AFTERWORD

I love my late father. I mean no denigration to his memory by what I’ve written in this post. Dad didn’t drink, smoke, cheat on my mother, or lay hands on his children—ever. He was good to us in more ways than he was bad.  Life/fate/demons/God chose a great many tortures for this man and he lived through most—many of us would not have made it. Almost three years since his passing I am still loath to admit the extent of his mental illness—but there’s just simply no denying it: the only thing debatable is its cause(s). In looking back I am absolutely amazed that he accomplished what he did given his circumstances.

None of what I’ve said will come as any surprise to those who knew him or my family—especially those who knew him or us long ago. I’ve now written about the fact that he did things he shouldn’t have and he involved some of his family in those things. To some this may seem like speaking ill of the dead, but it’s simply the truth—and our shared story would not be complete without including this part of the tale.

And last, to those who may be lurking, please don’t bother pulling a badge and search warrant, or writing a moral-cause termination letter, all of this happened long ago and no artifact of this time remains—and don’t forget that all this may be a work of fiction anyway: recall my title and the caveat that opened this post.


“Visiting Dad” is a series regarding my father and my relationship with him, as seen through my eyes. There will be no set time-line to this series: it will consist of random excerpts of life written as the mood strikes me. It is my intention to post to this series each Friday for a few weeks . . . we’ll see where it goes from there. (Please see my “Series: Visiting Dad” category for other posts in this series.)


Visiting Dad: Plausible deniability (part 1)

“The truth is messy. It’s raw and uncomfortable. You can’t blame people for preferring lies.” —Holly Black (Red Glove) 

“But the hangman isn’t hangin’ and they put you on the street – yeah you go back, Jack, do it again” —Steely Dan (Do It Again) 


In late 1972 a brief article appeared in a local newspaper announcing a change of venue for a jury trial. A crime was alleged and the possible punishment—incarceration—listed. I was a 15 year-old sophomore at the time: a reed-thin, nerdy, sensitive kid. A couple of seniors—farm-raised, football-hero types—showed the article to me while we were in study hall in the school’s library. One of the two made a smart-ass comment to me about it. The other asked me, in a slightly more tactful manner, what I knew about it. I told both boys the truth: I had absolutely no idea about anything mentioned in the article—but yes, I recognized the name involved. Enjoying the shocked look on my face, the smart-assed one asked me if I thought I should go home and ask some questions.  

 ____________________________________

To say that my Dad was royally pissed when he found out about article would be a gross understatement. With no discussion he told me, Tim, and Steve (two of my three bothers) to go get in the car. We immediately drove to a neighboring city where the headquarters for the county’s newspaper was located.

The four of us walked into the newspaper’s office and Dad demanded to see the reporter involved with the story. The receptionist he’d just barked at mumbled something about needing an appointment. Sensing tension, everyone within earshot turned to look at us. Several cubicles back a head popped up; Dad recognized the reporter and he quickly herded us towards him.

Assuming an aggressive posture, my father loudly instructed the reporter that he needed to—right this second—tell the kids standing in front of him that the person named in his newspaper article just happened to have the same name as him: that the guy mentioned was a different George Kinnard (my father and I share the same name). The reporter’s expression was a combination of surprise and fear. He managed to stammer something unintelligible. Dad seized the opportunity and yelled to my brothers and me, “See, he just told you kids this was someone else!” Dad then announced that he had got what he wanted and we were now going to get the hell out of there. We jumped in the car and left. For the moment at least, we kids were convinced the article involved someone else—and would be happy to say so if and when we were confronted about it.

 ____________________________________

We didn’t know it at the time, but Dad had a big problem on his hands. If convicted of the alleged crime—the one he insisted involved someone else—he would go to jail. To avoid this he needed help from someone with clout. A few days later my father took me, Tim, and Steve, on a trip to see such a person.

 ____________________________________

The four of us drove the 50 miles from our farmhouse in rural Missouri to Kansas City in Dad’s brand new 1972 Chevy Impala. Without giving much in the way of details, Dad told us that we were going to KC for a visit with his great uncle David—a guy we had never heard of before. One of the very few things dad did mention was the fact that his great uncle was a detective for the Kansas City Police Department. (Kansas City was where the alleged crime had taken place—but we weren’t making the connection yet.) My brothers and I—no strangers to weird road trips with Dad—were in full just-what-in-the-hell-is-going-on-here mode.

We arrived and were introduced. The grownups had business to attend to in private, so we three kids were told to head downstairs to the basement recreation room for soda and snacks. We were also told there was a pool table down there that we were free to use if we wished. We played pool in silence hoping to hear a bit of what was going on upstairs—but only an occasional whisper reached our ears.

____________________________________

The visit ended and we headed down I-35 to begin the long ride home. Dad seemed a little off: smiling and upbeat, but in an artificial way—like someone who’s trying just a little too hard. I was riding in the front passenger seat of the Impala; Tim and Steve were in the back of the car. Dad turned to me and invited me to find something to listen to on the radio . . .  WHAT! I could not believe what I had just heard! Did I hear him say to pick out something I wanted to listen to? This had never happened before: we listened to his baseball games or his country music when we traveled with Dad—period. I quickly recognized this gesture for what it really was: a distraction to camouflage the fact that some really heavy shit had just gone down.    

Although Dad’s new Chevy had only come equipped with an AM radio, it featured a seriously cool front and rear speaker system with factory reverb. This setup produced crystal-clear music with just a touch of echo in the background. As far as my novice-audiophile ears were concerned, the clarity was off the charts: I swear I could hear sounds on this radio that I had never heard on another. I tuned the radio to a local rock station. Steely Dan’s new song, Do It Again, was just starting up, so I left the dial pointed there. No one said a word as we drove on and listened to the music.

Prior to making this trip, Dad had polished his brand-new, black-on-gold Impala to absolute perfection. During the daytime the car’s factory-tinted windows gave its passengers the appearance of coolness: like being seen wearing a pair of high quality, trendy sunglasses—Ray-Bans, perhaps. But now it was dark—dark in more ways than one—and the immaculate tinted windows only added a sense of disquiet to this very strange day.

For some reason there was almost no traffic—it was like we had the highway to ourselves. Through the Chevy’s pristine windows I studied all the weird light, shadows, and reflections created by the high-pressure sodium streetlights and their tall poles as they illuminated the interstate. I thought that in a strange way this reminded me of traveling through a dark forest during the daytime. Do It Again played on as the Impala’s reverb system highlighted all that was exotic in this cutting-edge, spooky-as-hell piece of rock & roll music. We drove on as the loud music and total silence joined together to exist as one in this moment.

These few minutes—the beginning of our journey home—proved to be one of the most surreal experiences I’ve ever been through. This was a watershed moment for me: a point that divided innocence from knowledge, light from dark, and past from what would become future. I will never, ever forget it.  

 ____________________________________

Immediately after our trip to see our father’s great uncle—the police detective—Dad’s legal problem disappeared. It simply vanished without a trace. There was no explanation, no discussion, and no follow-up article in the county’s newspaper. Simply put, it was as if it never happened. My father never spoke of this again. The problem had went away—reality is a fluid thing in our family.   

I truly wish the story ended here. . . .  

[Part 2 of "Visiting Dad: Plausible deniability" posts Saturday]

 


“Visiting Dad” is a series regarding my father and my relationship with him, as seen through my eyes. There will be no set time-line to this series: it will consist of random excerpts of life written as the mood strikes me. It is my intention to post to this series each Friday for a few weeks . . . we’ll see where it goes from there. (Please see my “Series: Visiting Dad” category for other posts in this series.)